Compare tools
Side-by-side features, use cases and pricing — because the right pick depends on your job and budget, not just the ranking.
⇄ Comparison dimension — pick the market you're actually shopping in
✕
PerfAI
✓ verifiedFreemium
Agentic AppSec platform that probes AI-generated apps for logic and access-control flaws and opens auto-fix pull requests.
845 saves
✕
QA.tech
✓ verifiedPaid
AI agent-based end-to-end testing platform for SaaS teams that runs exploratory and PR-triggered tests without maintaining test scripts.
29K visits/mo8.7K saves
Pricing
Free: $0/month (900 credits/month)
Pro: $99/month (1,800 credits/month)
Growth: $499/month (5,400 credits/month)
No public pricing
Core features
- ✦Automated mapping of app flows, roles, and auth logic
- ✦70+ AI-native and OWASP threat category testing
- ✦Exploit verification before flagging an issue
- ✦Auto-generated pull requests with fixes
- ✦Direct fix push into Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Replit, or Windsurf
- ✦Continuous 24/7 testing instead of scheduled scans
- ✦AI agents that visually explore and test UI like a real user
- ✦Automatic PR-triggered test runs via GitHub/Vercel preview integration
- ✦Self-healing tests that adapt to UI and workflow changes
- ✦Mobile web, iOS, and Android app testing support
- ✦Detailed debugging with screenshots, logs, and failure reasoning
- ✦Cloud-native execution with no source-code access required
Use cases
- →Securing apps built rapidly with AI coding assistants
- →Catching business-logic and access-control bugs before launch
- →Reducing manual pentest cycles for fast-shipping teams
- →Ongoing security monitoring for live AI-generated applications
- →Engineering teams wanting regression testing without maintaining scripts
- →SaaS companies needing continuous QA feedback on every pull request
- →Teams replacing manual QA hours with automated agent-driven testing
Visit